World leaders gathered in one place… ASN convened to take action on freedom, sovereignty, energy and security.
- Grace 은혜 Kim
- 12 hours ago
- 33 min read
From March 4 to 6, 2026, the Alliance of Sovereign Nations convened in Washington, D.C., bringing together conservative leaders from politics, economics, academia, and civil society across more than 80 countries. The summit highlighted pressing global issues and emphasized the critical importance of national sovereignty. The event was hosted by Turning Point Action, the conservative nonprofit advocacy organization founded by the late Charlie Kirk.
Turning Point Action focuses on training young conservative activists and leaders in the United States, supporting electoral initiatives, and promoting the defense of national sovereignty, free markets, and traditional values. While Turning Point USA (TPUSA) serves as a “learning organization,” TPAction operates as an “action-oriented organization.” Legally separate, the two organizations share leadership under Charlie Kirk and operate with aligned branding as sister entities.
This summit was recognized not merely as an academic gathering, but as a platform where global conservative leaders could share strategies, discuss policies, and pursue practical collaboration. On the evening of March 4, attendees were welcomed with a reception, followed on March 5 by a full day of sessions, breakout discussions, and networking. On the final day, March 6, participants toured key American institutions, including the National Archives, Congress, the Library of Congress, and the Supreme Court, gaining firsthand insight into U.S. governance and institutional frameworks. The itinerary was designed to provide a deeper understanding of national sovereignty and freedom through the lens of American history, offering insights applicable to real-world policy challenges.
Anna Paulina Luna, Honorary Chair of the Alliance of Sovereign Nations (Photo courtesy of Alliance of Sovereign Nations)
Honorary Chair Anna Paulina Luna (U.S. Representative, Florida) delivered the opening address, assessing the crises facing the United States and the world, and emphasizing the urgent need to defend freedom and national sovereignty. Luna noted, “Bureaucracies, decisions made in conference rooms far from the people, and rules-based global orders that disregard human history do not serve citizens they serve outside interests. Today’s global order increasingly undermines public trust.”
She outlined three key priorities. First, on free speech and censorship, Luna stressed, “Democracy cannot survive if it fears the voices of its own citizens. Governments that silence dissent destroy democracy rather than defend it.” Second, regarding energy independence, she warned, “A nation cannot be sovereign if it cannot generate its own energy. Energy policy is not about international declarations or carbon targets, it is about the survival of families and industries, and national security.” Third, on borders and immigration, she argued, “Borders are not symbols of hostility, but expressions of responsibility. Each nation has the basic duty to decide who enters its territory. This is not xenophobia; it is the fundamental act of sovereignty.”
Luna emphasized that these issues are interconnected, reflecting the principle that nations must retain control over their political and economic destiny. The summit, she explained, exists to foster a global network of leaders who prioritize freedom and sovereignty above all else, and who are committed to translating these principles into practical policy outcomes.
Mike Johnson, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives (Photo courtesy of the Alliance of Sovereign Nations)
After Luna’s speech, she introduced Mike Johnson, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. Speaker Johnson began his speech by emphasizing the foundation of the United States on the Constitution and conservative values. He said, “Our values are given by God, and no one can take them away. Rights come not from the state, but from God,” explaining the fundamental reason why the United States has been able to grow into a great nation.
He then mentioned his career and experience, highlighting the importance of energy independence, freedom of speech, and immigration policy. Johnson, who is from Louisiana and has long worked on energy and immigration issues, said, “Through the past four years, we have developed policies together with leaders who share values similar to those of the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC).” He emphasized the existing global network of conservative leaders that connects European and American figures, committed to defending national sovereignty and traditional values.
Speaker Johnson presented concrete achievements and the current status of the United States, explaining how government measures over the past year, such as strengthening border security, reducing inflation, and achieving energy independence, have contributed to the well-being of citizens and national security. He particularly emphasized the results of strong immigration policy, saying, “Last year, illegal border crossings were maintained at zero for nine consecutive months.” On the economic front, he introduced achievements such as increasing household income and improving the ability to purchase homes through the “Working Families Tax Relief” law. Regarding energy policy, he explained the transition from American energy independence to American Energy Dominance, detailing that average gasoline prices have dropped to about half.
In terms of foreign policy and security, Speaker Johnson stressed the role and responsibility of the United States. He insisted, “America does not need to be the world’s police, but when necessary, it must use power to achieve peace by protecting freedom and allies.” Based on this principle, he introduced recent international achievements, including military stabilization in Iran and the Middle East, as well as the return of Israeli hostages, emphasizing that the “America First” principle has a positive impact on the international order beyond domestic policy. He also mentioned that traditional allies such as NATO are increasing their defense investments, highlighting the possibility of strengthening national sovereignty and cooperation among allies led by the United States.
Concluding his speech, Speaker Johnson emphasized that the revival of the United States serves as an example to other nations, showing that sovereign countries can protect their own interests while maintaining strong alliances. He reflected that America’s 250th anniversary is an opportunity to recommit to the principles of self-governance, freedom, and moral responsibility. Speaker Johnson also recalled Ronald Reagan’s enduring warnings, saying that freedom must be fought for and preserved by each generation, and encouraged attendees to continue efforts in their respective countries to protect sovereignty, freedom, and traditional values.
Immediately after Speaker Mike Johnson’s speech, the first discussion session focused on “Freedom of Speech & Censorship.” Moderated by Representative Andy Ogles, U.S. Representative for Tennessee’s 5th Congressional District, the session included conservative politicians from the United States and Europe, who discussed issues of free expression suppression and its impact on national sovereignty.
Representative Ogles explained the background of the discussion in terms of geopolitical tension and ideological conflict, emphasizing that debates on freedom of speech are not merely legal issues, but are directly connected to democratic governance and the future of national systems. He warned that political and cultural forces across Western democracies are attempting to suppress opposing opinions and urged each country to actively exercise the right to independently decide on immigration policies and political freedoms.
The first speaker, Markus Frohnmaier, a member of the German Bundestag, AfD(Alternative for Germany), connected the issue of freedom of expression with debates over Europe’s economic and climate policies. He raised the issue of freedom of expression strongly alongside the economic and political challenges Europe faces. He mentioned that in former President Donald Trump’s National Security Strategy, the chapter on Europe was titled “Promoting European Greatness”, and said that Europe must resolve several structural problems to regain competitiveness.
In particular, he criticized European Union regulations for weakening Europe’s economy. Emphasizing that he comes from the southwestern region of Germany, the center of the German automotive industry, he argued that the EU’s policy to ban the sale of internal combustion engine cars from 2035 could destroy the foundation of the German automotive industry. He pointed out that such policies weaken the competitiveness of European industry while benefiting Chinese companies, which are already growing rapidly in the electric vehicle market.
Frohnmaier also argued that debates over climate policy are connected to the issue of freedom of expression in Europe. He mentioned cases where scientists questioning climate policy became targets of social criticism or exclusion, creating an environment where critical opinions on policy are difficult to discuss freely. He explained that Germany’s energy policy is also at the center of this debate, and claimed that the policy to close nuclear power plants and gradually phase out coal power has caused rising energy prices and weakened industrial competitiveness.
He introduced examples where he feels freedom of expression is shrinking in German society. He referred to cases where citizens were investigated for political statements or experienced social pressure due to political expression, emphasizing that economic policy and political debates are closely linked to democracy and freedom of expression.
Next, George Simion, Chairman of the Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), Romania, raised the issue of freedom of speech within the context of the international political environment. He argued that conservative political forces in several countries are being demonized and attacked by globalist puppets in their nations, similar to what President Donald Trump and his political movement have faced.
Simion also claimed that in some diplomatic and political networks, individuals connected to George Soros are working against freedom of speech and conservative political forces. He criticized these movements as acting against the values of freedom represented by the Republican Party, the Trump administration, and the Declaration of Independence.
He emphasized the significance of bringing together political leaders from around the world at this event. He noted that participants from countries such as South Sudan, South Korea, Guatemala, Honduras, Serbia, Estonia, and Georgia share the values of the free world, and stressed that this international solidarity has important meaning.
Simion specifically referenced Romania’s political situation, stating that while support for President Trump is high among the Romanian people, the government often follows the positions of Western European governments such as France, Spain, and Germany. He argued that this political direction does not reflect the will of the people.
In closing, he highlighted that attendees from approximately 50 countries have gathered to protect the free world, and stressed that efforts to defend freedom of speech, democracy, and the freedom of the next generation must continue.
Barbara Bonte, Member of the European Parliament representing Belgium’s Vlaams Belang party, focused on the increasingly restricted state of freedom of speech within the European political environment. She described the political situation in the Flemish region, emphasizing that protecting cultural identity and national sovereignty is a key goal of her political activity.
Bonte particularly highlighted the imbalance in media coverage and opportunities for political expression. She claimed that even when her party achieves high support in polls, their opportunities to speak on public broadcasters are often limited, explaining that public media fails to reflect sufficient political diversity. She also noted that the lack of balanced representation of different political perspectives in the media is a significant problem for democracy.
She raised concerns that political bias may also exist within academia and the judicial system, arguing that such environments can have long-term effects on political debate and freedom of expression. She cited cases where politically controversial online content led to legal issues, suggesting that such circumstances could suppress public discourse.
Bonte also mentioned the European Union’s digital regulation policies, warning that measures introduced under the guise of combating disinformation may affect the expression of opinions on social media. In particular, she noted that policies like the Digital Services Act strengthen content moderation powers on online platforms, which could limit political opinions and criticism of policies.
Concluding her speech, Bonte emphasized that freedom of speech is a core principle of democracy. She stated that democracy can only be healthy when citizens can freely express their opinions and participate in political debate, and that protecting these freedoms is a crucial responsibility of political leaders.
Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Member of the European Parliament from Croatia representing the European Conservatives and Reformists Group (ECR), spoke on the challenges freedom of speech faces in Europe. He criticized the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) for treating online speech as a regulated “commodity,” implying a lack of trust in citizens’ ability to read information and make judgments independently. He argued that this approach ultimately restricts freedom of speech and opens the door to abuse of power.
Bartulica also pointed out that even when conservative parties win elections in Europe, they sometimes cannot exercise actual political power. He claimed that mainstream political forces and left-wing alliances block the participation of conservative and nationalist parties, creating a structural barrier to political influence.
He highlighted a recent incident where some left-leaning MEPs tried to cancel an event he hosted on freedom of speech, emphasizing that attempts to suppress political debate continue. Bartulica stressed the importance of defending freedom of speech, stating, “I didn’t enter politics to be politically correct.”
Towards the end of his speech, he referenced American thinker Thomas Sowell, criticizing the political philosophy of elites seeking to control society. He also warned of the growing influence of unelected bureaucratic powers, such as the European Commission, and called for a stronger, clearer voice to protect freedom of speech and democracy. Bartulica highlighted the Donald Trump administration as a key ally in this effort, underlining the importance of international cooperation.
In the latter part of the session, U.S. Congress members also spoke. Derrick Van Orden, Representative of Wisconsin’s 3rd Congressional District, emphasized that defending freedom of speech is not merely a right but a national duty. He stressed that both citizens and politicians must stand against existing power structures and media pressure, citing examples of political attacks and public criticism. Van Orden urged the audience that courage and consistency are essential to defend liberty and sovereignty.
Kat Cammack, U.S. Representative for Florida’s 3rd Congressional District, spoke focusing on freedom of speech and political division. She addressed the various political leaders from different countries present at the event, emphasizing that while political perspectives may differ, “the reason we are gathered here is clear,” and underscored that “we believe in freedom of speech.”
Cammack referenced her military service to provide personal context on the value of freedom. She explained that she joined the U.S. Navy to fight against oppressive systems such as communism, emphasizing that the choice between freedom and oppression is a critical challenge every nation faces. She also cited her service in Bosnia and Herzegovina to highlight the importance of international efforts to protect freedom.
She specifically criticized the COVID-19 lockdown policies in the United States, noting how the government restricted citizens’ movement, social activity, and even speech. Cammack stated that policies dictating whom citizens could meet, how far apart they must remain, and excluding individuals from schools or workplaces based on vaccination status represented “directions a free society should never take.”
Cammack further addressed recent incidents of political violence and threats, arguing that such actions are ultimately aimed at silencing people. She referenced former President Donald Trump, emphasizing that freedom and the right to speak must be defended even in the face of political violence and intimidation.
In the latter part of her speech, Cammack highlighted how overemphasizing political differences can drive social division. She noted that political strategies often make people focus on the 10% of disagreement despite sharing 90% of values and goals. She stressed the need to overcome these divisions and cooperate around the common value of freedom.
She concluded by stating, “The freedom to publicly express one’s opinion is the fundamental foundation of a free society, even before democracy,” emphasizing that the principle of protecting freedom of speech must be upheld regardless of political differences. Cammack urged attendees to speak boldly, without fear, and to work together to defend freedom.
All speakers in this session consistently emphasized that freedom of speech is deeply connected to political power, national identity, and institutional authority. Representative Ogles concluded the session by acknowledging the political and personal risks faced by those challenging the established political order, while underscoring the ongoing need to defend the fundamental liberties of Western civilization.
This discussion went beyond a simple exchange of opinions, serving as a platform to identify challenges to free expression faced by the global conservative political network and to discuss strategies for its protection and solidarity. Participants reaffirmed that safeguarding freedom of speech is not merely a legal right, but a core value that states and civil societies must collectively uphold. The session highlighted the shared understanding among U.S. and European conservative circles that free expression is intrinsically linked to national sovereignty, political diversity, and the preservation of democratic institutions.
After the first session concluded with discussions on national identity and democratic resilience, the speech of Anna Rathert, Member of the German Bundestag, began. Rathert traced her collaboration with Congresswoman Luna back to a chance encounter in Florida in October. While visiting her husband’s family, she saw a social media post from Luna stating that she looked forward to meeting AfD (Alternative für Deutschland) members from the German federal and regional parliaments. Anna Rathert immediately visited Luna’s constituency office, and within 24 hours, both sides were discussing the growing need to respond to the shift of power from nations and their citizens toward international organizations. She emphasized, “Democracy can only flourish when the people themselves can determine their political future,” highlighting that the protection of sovereignty and identity is fundamental to liberal democracy.
Rathert evaluated the event as creating a new platform for cooperation between Europe and the United States. She stressed the importance of safeguarding citizens’ rights and restoring the autonomous decision-making power of nations in the face of changing international order. She stated, “Sovereignty is not an outdated concept; it is the foundation on which democracy functions,” arguing that political authority must remain accountable to the people, and international structures should support rather than replace the state.
Further, Rathert referenced a speech by Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference, explaining that reclaiming cultural confidence and national identity is not merely a culture war but a process of protecting freedom from cultural pressures imposed over decades through international institutions.
She emphasized that democracy can only thrive when sovereignty and national identity are preserved, and that the fundamental right of a nation’s citizens to determine their own political future self-determination is essential. Anna Rathert also shared her recent visit to the National Archives Museum and her experience viewing the original Declaration of Independence, highlighting the symbolic importance of gatherings that defend national sovereignty. She concluded by stressing that such forums ensure political power remains accountable to the people and that international structures serve to support nations rather than replace them.
Following the speech of Anna Rathert, Member of the German Bundestag, the second session continued under the theme “Energy Sovereignty and the Strategic Role in Maintaining National Independence (Energy Independence).” This session was hosted by Ted Ellis, Director of the Power America Campaign and Deputy Director of Energy & Environment at the America First Policy Institute (AFPI). Ellis emphasized the central role of energy in maintaining national strength and argued that the United States must lead energy policies that protect the interests of its citizens.
Ellis stated that AFPI aligns with President Trump’s vision of Energy Dominance, stressing that abundant natural resources should not remain in the ground, but should be used to advance the national interest, the interest of the American people, and to provide strength both at home and abroad. He explained that energy powers every industry, forming the foundation for the American civilian industrial base, which in turn underpins the defense industrial base. He also noted that while some nations have successfully built policies toward energy dominance, others are still on the back foot in securing energy independence.
The first speaker, Arno Gujon, Director of the Office for Public and Cultural Diplomacy at the Serbian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, originally from France and currently a member of the Serbian Parliament, emphasized Serbia’s energy sovereignty and strategy to maintain national independence, stressing the importance of policies that put the national interest first. He mentioned that when he first visited Serbia in 2005, he witnessed the massacres of Christians and the destruction of churches and monasteries in Kosovo and Metohija, and said that everything is possible if you do it with your heart and with ideals, achieving national independence and energy sovereignty through the so-called “Serbian Dream.”
Gujon noted that President Donald Trump’s victory in the United States had a positive impact on defending patriotic values in Europe, and he stressed the need for solidarity with patriotic political forces active across European countries. He pointed out that globalism, woke ideology, NGOs, and media have continuously attacked patriotic forces in Europe, and emphasized: “We have to fight together based on our common values, especially the values rooted in Greek philosophy and Christianity.”
He explained energy policy in connection with national sovereignty, saying that despite pressures from external forces, including the EU, Serbia puts the interests of the people and the nation first. “The national interest comes first. It is not about following what someone else is demanding.”
Gujon detailed the strategies the Serbian government has pursued to preserve traditional values and energy independence. He explained that Serbia uses coal power, hydropower, and modular nuclear power, ensuring that it does not fall behind in data centers and AI industry competition.
He emphasized the importance of hydropower: “Our rivers are very special, and they allow stable electricity production all year round.”
He stressed that renewable energy is not just an environmentally friendly measure, but a strategic asset for national independence. Through this energy strategy, Serbia maintains sustainable economic and technological competitiveness under external pressure, and it establishes a key tool for preserving national sovereignty and strategic autonomy in the future.
The next speaker, Nikoloz Samkharadze, Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the Parliament of Georgia, emphasized the strategic importance of securing Georgia’s energy sovereignty and maintaining national independence. He stated that “Georgia is a partially occupied country, with 20% of its territory under occupation by the Russian Federation,” and explained that the core goal of the Georgian Dream is to restore national sovereignty and ensure the economic well-being of its people. Samkharadze pointed out that Western interference in elections and domestic policy, along with NGO activities, has undermined the legitimacy of democratically elected governments and fueled violence and unrest, underscoring the importance of sovereignty and free elections.
Energy sovereignty was highlighted as a key component of Georgia’s strategy to maintain national independence. He recalled how in the 1990s, Russia used energy as a political tool, cutting off supply to Georgia, demonstrating the risks that energy dependence poses to national sovereignty. However, through cooperation with Azerbaijan, Georgia has established a stable and mutually beneficial energy supply chain, allowing it to maintain independent energy policy despite Russian pressure.
Samkharadze detailed Georgia’s ongoing strategic projects, including the Black Sea submarine cable connecting the South Caucasus power grid to the European Union, and the Caspian Sea underwater cable transporting Central Asian energy through Georgia and Azerbaijan to Europe. He explained that these projects position Georgia not just as an energy consumer, but as a strategic energy hub connecting Europe and Central Asia, serving as a core instrument for national sovereignty and security.
He also outlined Georgia’s plan to build three new hydroelectric power plants over the next ten years, tripling electricity generation and highlighting the importance of a self-sufficient energy strategy leveraging the country’s abundant hydro resources. “These projects provide energy security and form a critical foundation for maintaining national independence,”
he concluded, noting that cooperation among democratically elected governments and strategic alliances of sovereign nations will strengthen both energy efficiency and energy independence.
The next speaker, Petra Steger, Member of the European Parliament for Austria’s Freedom Party (FPÖ), strongly criticized European Union energy policies and issues of national sovereignty, emphasizing the strategic importance of energy independence. Steger highlighted that the EU has pushed unilateral climate policies and regulations without properly considering traditional industries and energy infrastructure, undermining the sovereignty and competitiveness of its member states. She specifically pointed to the carbon emissions trading system, the simultaneous reduction of nuclear and coal power plants, and the so-called energy transition (Energiewende) as policies that artificially drive up energy prices in Europe, inflicting severe damage on industrial competitiveness and national economies.
“The European Union is failing to protect the energy security of its member states,” she said, citing recent instances of energy supply cutoffs in Hungary and other member states. While Ukraine blocked energy transport through the Druzhba pipeline, the EU took no action and, she argued, even indirectly intervened politically in Hungarian elections. According to Steger, these EU actions threaten energy supply chains and national independence, resulting in weakened European economic competitiveness, job losses, and budget pressures.
Steger also criticized EU green energy investments, particularly the focus on wind and solar power. “Europe continues to push climate policies as a ‘good example,’ but in reality, it fails to meet demand and structurally drives energy prices to abnormal levels,” she explained. She emphasized that EU policies ignore technical and economic realities, weakening member states’ ability to secure independent energy while posing a serious threat to national sovereignty.
Ultimately, Steger stressed the strategic value of energy independence. In the context of EU centralization and globalist-driven regulations, she argued that member states must secure their own energy sovereignty and economic self-reliance to protect national sovereignty and democratic autonomy. She emphasized that not only Austria, but all of Europe, must achieve practical independence through energy security and diversified supply chains, thereby ensuring both economic competitiveness and social stability.
Finally, Byron Donalds (U.S. Representative for Florida’s 19th Congressional District and candidate for Governor of Florida) and Ryan Zinke (former U.S. Secretary of the Interior and U.S. Representative for Montana’s 1st Congressional District) addressed energy sovereignty in the United States in greater depth.
Byron Donalds emphasized the importance of nuclear power in maintaining U.S. energy policy and national independence. He stressed that securing energy sovereignty is crucial for both economic strength and national security. Donalds stated clearly that the foundation of the American economy is energy, and without energy, even industrial production, agriculture, IT, artificial intelligence (AI), and quantum computing cannot function. He highlighted nuclear power as the only source that can provide stable, reliable energy, noting that the U.S. has the technical and resource capacity but decades of policy mistakes have weakened the nuclear base.
Donalds identified restoring domestic uranium mining and enrichment as a top priority. He pointed out that past U.S. policy made the country dependent on Russia for uranium enrichment, despite abundant uranium resources across the U.S., including Florida and New Mexico. These resources, he said, can be used to develop advanced small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors, which can supply stable electricity to the grid at a fraction of the cost of traditional large light-water reactors. He also noted that spent nuclear fuel recycling technology can maximize fuel efficiency while maintaining safety and significantly reducing costs.
He stressed that nuclear power is not just important for domestic energy security. With the exploding energy demand from next-generation data centers and AI industries, stable base-load power is essential, and nuclear is the key. While natural gas and clean coal are necessary, renewable sources like wind and solar are intermittent and unstable. Nuclear power, by contrast, provides consistent, reliable, sustainable electricity. Considering the environmental costs of producing and disposing of solar panels and wind turbines, nuclear is actually the greenest form of energy.
Donalds’ central message is clear: to maintain national sovereignty, energy independence, and economic prosperity, the U.S. must adopt an energy strategy centered on nuclear power. By combining technical resources, regulatory reform, advanced reactor development, and fuel recycling, the U.S. can ensure stable energy supply and cost competitiveness, while offering a sustainable energy model to allies and partners. He emphasized that without energy sovereignty, national sovereignty cannot be preserved.
Ryan Zinke (former U.S. Secretary of the Interior and U.S. Representative for Montana’s 1st Congressional District) emphasized a strategic approach that plays a key role in U.S. energy sovereignty and maintaining national independence. Zinke stated that he is a former SEAL Team 6 Navy member and, as Secretary of the Interior under President Trump, he directly led the expansion of America’s energy production, which gave rise to the concept of “Energy Dominance.” At the time, the United States was producing 8.3 million barrels of oil per day and declining, but by setting a target to surpass Russia, production increased to 12.5 million barrels per day within two years. Zinke highlighted that energy produced in the U.S., using domestic technology and regulatory frameworks, is far more environmentally sound and safer than energy produced in other countries.
From an economic perspective, Zinke stressed that reliable, affordable, and abundant energy is central to national competitiveness. He pointed out the instability and supply chain issues of solar and wind, arguing that these renewable energies do not actually lower environmental or economic costs. In the U.S. and Europe, environmental damage occurs during the manufacturing and disposal of solar panels and wind turbines, mostly in countries like China, which represents hidden costs that consumers do not directly see. He warned that a lack of energy weakens manufacturing and industrial competitiveness and shakes national sovereignty, emphasizing that energy security is directly tied to national independence.
Zinke explained the strategic roles of multiple energy sources, including nuclear power and natural gas, paying special attention to the technical potential of nuclear energy. He said nuclear plants can be put in pressure vessels and submerged thousands of feet underwater, or containerized small modular reactors can be placed on the power grid, providing stable and high-efficiency electricity. Natural gas serves as a bridge for the transition period, and in the future, advanced technology and innovation will make sustainable energy supply possible. Zinke emphasized that technology and innovation affect not only energy security but also national economy, industry, internet access, and AI development future national competitiveness.
He also noted the importance of energy sovereignty in the international competitive environment. Using China as an example, he pointed out that China focuses on coal and nuclear over solar and wind, and he stressed that countries valuing freedom and opportunity need to establish a stable and independent energy supply system. Zinke added that energy sovereignty goes beyond economics, it directly affects a nation’s ability to make autonomous decisions for its people regarding clean water, electricity, and other resources. His remarks clearly illustrate the link between energy strategy, national independence, and economic and security competitiveness.
The third session, “National Sovereignty & Foreign Migration,” moderated by Randy Fine (U.S. Representative for Florida’s 6th Congressional District), brought together four panelists from around the world to discuss the issues of mass migration and threats to national sovereignty. This session followed on from the second session’s discussion of changes in the global order and domestic policy challenges, connecting questions of borders, citizenship, and national sovereignty from a transatlantic perspective.
Representative Fine opened the session by emphasizing that every nation has the right to control its borders and to put the interests of its own citizens first. He noted, “This is a principle that former President Trump believes in here in the United States, but many countries do not follow it.” Fine, a freshman congressman who took office shortly after President Trump’s reelection, defined the core of today’s discussion as “migration flows and pressures on national sovereignty,” and explained that the session would examine shared challenges at the global level.
The first panelist, Zeljka Cvijanović (Zeljka Cvijanović, Serb member of the three-person Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina), made a clear statement on national sovereignty and foreign migration. Cvijanović explained that during the massive illegal migration to Bosnia in 2015, when she was Prime Minister, she decided that no migrant reception camps would be established in the Republika Srpska region. By contrast, the other federal entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, implemented some reception policies under pressure from European Union (EU) countries. Cvijanović, however, did not allow them in Republika Srpska, citing security and the stability of social structures as her reasons.
She emphasized that a nation maintaining strong borders and controlling them is not a sign of hostility but an expression of responsibility toward its citizens. Cvijanović stated, “It is important to provide an environment where people can live freely and safely,” expressing concern that accommodating illegal migrants could alter social structures and clash with existing cultural and civilizational values. At the time, EU countries criticized Republika Srpska’s measures and called for a more open stance, but she considered the policy the right choice to protect the long-term interests of the country and its citizens.
Cvijanović also noted strong similarities between her past policies and the immigration policies currently implemented in the United States under former President Donald Trump. “Looking at the policies we implemented ten years ago and comparing them with current U.S. actions shows that strong border control is no longer a hostile act but a symbol of responsible governance,” she said, emphasizing the importance of sovereignty protection and national security. She explained that approximately 49% of Republika Srpska’s territory did not host any migrant camps, attributing this outcome to strong institutional control and responsible policy implementation.
While Brussels advocated for “friendly and welcoming reception” for migrants, Cvijanović stressed that national leaders must prioritize responsibility to their citizens and maintain strong institutions. She added, “Implementing responsible policies for your citizens is how you demonstrate a strong nation and strong institutions,” making clear that managing national sovereignty and foreign migration is directly tied to protecting citizens and social stability, not just international image.
The first panelist from Western Europe, António Tânger Corrêa (Member of the European Parliament, Portugal), clearly stated his position on national sovereignty and foreign migration. Corrêa explained that Portugal’s migration problem is unfolding in a different form compared to other European countries. He pointed out that Muslim migrants from Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh who have increased in recent years do not respect the law and the way of life. Corrêa emphasized, “People with different culture, different religion, they do not respect our laws, they do not respect our way of life, they do not respect the so-called Western civilization.” He stressed that this poses a serious challenge to Portugal’s national identity and historical heritage, which has been maintained for 900 years.
The Chega Party has rapidly grown in the Portuguese parliament over the past five years and is now the second-largest party. Corrêa explained that the reason for this growth is that the party “pointed to the real situation in Portugal.” He criticized the government for denying crime and social problems, stating that increasing crime rates, social integration problems, denationalization, and violations of national sovereignty are occurring. In this situation, the citizens recognize the real issues more clearly than the government’s official statements, and Chega has paid attention and responded to this.
Corrêa also maintained a strong position on illegal migration across Europe. He said, “Currently in Europe, illegal migration is not needed,” emphasizing that claims of social and economic necessity are not true. He pointed out that in countries like Germany, people are losing jobs, and illegal migration is undermining social stability and acting as a factor that weakens sovereignty. Corrêa stated that it is important to inform citizens about this reality and to protect national sovereignty through political response.
Corrêa’s remarks simultaneously reveal political changes within Portugal and criticisms of the European Union’s migration policies. He argued that the EU’s pursuit of “unlimited migration and diversity” undermines national identity and sovereignty, and stressed the need for political responsibility and protection of citizens. This statement is regarded as an example of how some right-wing political forces in Europe connect illegal migration and cultural change to national security and sovereignty issues.
The Central America panelist, Kilvett Bertrand (Executive Secretary of the National Committee of the National Party of Honduras · Member of Congress), shared in detail Honduras’ experiences and responses regarding national sovereignty and foreign migration. He mentioned that over the past 15–16 years, the far-left government dominating Honduran politics, particularly the Libre Party and its ideological alignment with the Maduro regime, had limited Honduras’ sovereignty. He stated, “Our people lost hope due to the government’s wrong decisions, and migration seemed like the only future.” Bertrand noted that at that time, Honduras became a transit country for 6 million Venezuelan refugees, during which human trafficking and the influence of criminal organizations expanded.
He criticized the far-left government for injecting communist ideology through schools and public institutions, defining the United States as “an evil empire,” which undermined the people’s independence and free will. This was not merely a policy failure but a systematic attempt to shake national identity and sovereignty, depriving citizens of economic and social opportunities and pushing them to choose external migration. Bertrand emphasized that as a result, Honduras’ education and health systems were severely weakened, causing negative impacts on people’s lives and society overall.
Bertrand explained that Honduras is now restoring national sovereignty through strong diplomatic cooperation with the United States. He stated that in an upcoming historic meeting, President Tito Asfura and former President Trump will gather Latin American leaders who share freedom and sovereignty values. He explained that this will allow Honduras to protect its citizens and strengthen economic independence, breaking free from external migration pressure and internal far-left influence.
He also highlighted that the Honduran government is implementing strategies to reduce foreign migration pressure through improving citizens’ quality of life, attracting investment, and creating jobs. In 2025 alone, 45,000 Hondurans were stopped at the borders and deported back to the country due to attempts at illegal migration, which symbolized the hope and opportunities that the far-left government had failed to provide. Bertrand emphasized, “Our goal is to create an environment where our people can live safely and freely in our country without relying on external forces,” reiterating the importance of restoring national sovereignty and managing foreign migration.
The final panelist, Eli Crane (U.S. Representative for Arizona’s 2nd Congressional District), expressed strong concerns regarding national sovereignty and foreign migration issues facing the United States and Western countries. He introduced himself as a Christian and a Navy SEAL veteran, stating, “The biggest threat facing the United States and the West is not military attack, but Islamification and migration pressure.” Representative Crane emphasized that mass migration and cultural non-assimilation threaten national freedom and the rule of law. This is not merely a religious difference issue but a problem affecting sovereignty and the social structure as a whole. He pointed to examples in Europe and noted that similar “Islamic communities” are emerging in certain regions of the United States.
Crane explained that in some U.S. states and cities, cultural gaps and crime issues arise, and if large numbers of migrants continue not to respect local culture and laws, social stability and safety could be threatened. He criticized traditional threat assessments focused on military power, such as China’s nuclear and naval capabilities, arguing that these analyses fail to adequately reflect current cultural and ideological threats. Over the past several decades, the United States’ greatest vulnerabilities have been ideologies like communism, socialism, and, more recently, Islamist ideologies, which weaken the nation from within.
He referenced a briefing he received while serving in the Navy SEALs, where a Department of Defense intelligence officer warned that some Muslim families’ high birth rates could lead to long-term structural changes in Western societies. Compared to the American family average of 2.4 children, some Muslim families were having seven children. Crane highlighted that this demographic and cultural divergence is not simply an immigration policy issue but a matter of national survival strategy. He warned that if the United States and Western nations fail to protect citizens’ values and culture through immigration and refugee policies, internal collapse is likely.
To address these issues, Crane stressed the importance of legislation and public discourse. He referenced Texas’ ban on Sharia law, emphasizing, “We must create spaces and institutional mechanisms where citizens can discuss and respond to cultural infiltration.” Furthermore, he pointed out that ideological attacks related to cultural Marxism, such as social division and identity politics, are being used as tools to weaken the nation internally. He reiterated that protecting national sovereignty and managing foreign migration is not a mere political choice but a matter of survival strategy.
Panelists collectively noted that large-scale migration policies are being implemented in a planned manner with ideological objectives. Cases such as border control in Bosnia, Chega Party policies in Portugal, and Honduras’ restoration of sovereignty illustrate how mass migration affects national cohesion, cultural integration, and political autonomy. The session concluded by emphasizing that national sovereignty is directly linked to a nation’s ability to protect its people, culture, and institutions, and that border management and migration control are moral and strategic imperatives, not just policy choices.
After the third session, National Sovereignty & Foreign Migration, concluded, the event took a brief break before continuing with the keynote address. This keynote acted as a bridge connecting the panel discussion, providing attendees with political and ideological context. Representative Ana Paulina Luna introduced the speaker, emphasizing the spirit of collaboration that made the event possible.
The keynote was delivered by Mike Haridopoulos (U.S. Representative for Florida’s 8th Congressional District). Through his speech, he highlighted conservative values and the protection of individual freedom. Haridopoulos shared his long-standing friendship and joint campaign experiences with Representative Luna, stressing the importance of politicians who have the courage and moral conviction to speak truth to power. He particularly focused on restoring American respect on the world stage through cooperation with President Donald Trump and promoting changes in established power structures.
In his address, Haridopoulos explained policy achievements over the past year that had a tangible positive impact on citizens’ lives, including economic recovery, stable prices, lower interest rates, and a rising stock market. He cited tax benefits, such as the $1,400 annual provision for tip earners, emphasizing the conservative philosophy of empowering individuals rather than government. Conversely, he warned that liberal policies tend to centralize power in the federal government, creating a “nanny state” that limits individual choice.
Haridopoulos also discussed the role of the younger generation, the challenge to political correctness (PC), and the restoration of religious expression as key priorities. He praised organizations like Turning Point for enabling conservative youth to return to their communities, speak truth to power, and implement policies grounded in individual liberty and responsibility. Finally, he expressed his intent to collaborate with congressional leadership to limit government power, expand citizens’ freedom, and create greater opportunities both domestically and internationally. The keynote did not merely conclude the event but served as an intellectual and motivational bridge, highlighting the importance of putting these principles into practice within both domestic and global contexts.
The final session of the event, Mastering Power, Preparing to Govern & Reclaiming Civil Society, was led by Kristen Ziccarelli (Director of the Civilizational Action Project at the America First Policy Institute (AFPI)). After the session, the program immediately proceeded to a Q&A session called Next Steps & Action Items, also moderated by Ziccarelli. Her speech was connected to the previous keynote address, explaining the relationship between electoral strategy and actual governance and institutional readiness.
AFPI was founded in 2021 by Larry Kudlow, Secretary Linda McMahon, and Secretary Brooke Rollins, who were key leaders implementing the America First agenda in the Trump administration starting in 2017. They sought to systematize preparation for governing beyond mere electoral victory.
Ziccarelli emphasized that winning an election is only the beginning, and the craft of governing requires thorough preparation, understanding institutions, and securing professional personnel capable of immediate policy implementation. She explained the structural difference between political appointees and civil servants in the U.S., noting that of the roughly two million federal employees, only a tiny fraction are replaced with a new administration. Ministries, regulatory agencies, and civil society institutions continue regardless of election results, which can create friction in policy implementation. Similar structures exist in Europe, and effective governance comes from the harmony of advance planning, structural transition, political will, and administrative capability.
The speech also highlighted the wide-ranging role of civil society, including universities, think tanks, civic organizations, corporations, media, and courts. Ziccarelli cited examples of the American progressive movement preparing governance through such networks and stated that America First is benchmarking these efforts. Institutional readiness determines whether principles endure; poorly executed policies can undermine even strong ideological convictions.
Ziccarelli stressed the importance of nurturing talent within the party. Effective governance requires prepared organizations and institutions through building key personnel pools, investing in policy research, educating legislators on regulations and policies, and collaborating with legal, academic, and civil society experts. She noted that mastering power is not just acquiring power but also involves strategic thinking, respecting civil servants, acting within constitutional bounds, and careful planning of reform sequences.
The speech also had an international perspective. Drawing on her experiences growing up in Europe and traveling through Germany, Slovenia, and the UK, Ziccarelli emphasized that cultural confidence, national heritage, and accountable institutions are essential for successful governance. She added that each nation must be ready to actively protect and develop its civilizational heritage.
During the Q&A, questions flowed on various national issues including institutional strategy, freedom of expression, and policy execution. Zicarelli repeatedly emphasized action-oriented thinking and the importance of building institutions, introducing the case of AFPI (America First Policy Institute), which has built a policy ecosystem from scratch since its founding in 2021. He stressed that sustainable governance is only possible when electoral victories are matched with organizational and institutional preparation.
When asked about practical issues in countries with weak civil society or underdeveloped bureaucracies, such as Australia and South Sudan, he responded that while the U.S. model cannot be directly applied, the principles of preparation, coalition-building, and strategic execution are universally valid. He also noted that freedom of expression should be a core value both domestically and internationally, and that maintaining this through concrete actions helps sustain diplomatic trust.
In closing the session, Zicarelli highlighted that winning an election is just the beginning. Sustained leadership requires strategic preparation, institutional capacity, and building citizen trust. Only by combining vision and execution can the authority gained from an election be converted into real policy outcomes.
The final session of the event featured Kristen Ziccarelli’s speech and Q&A, “Mastering Power, Preparing to Govern & Reclaiming Civil Society”, after which U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna officially closed the event. Luna connected the discussions of the day to the strategic challenges of each government and the need to rebuild civil society, presenting directions for future action.
In her bridge remarks, Luna first emphasized to participants the importance of networking and trust-building. She mentioned, “I believe you all met each other yesterday, built trust, and exchanged contacts,” confirming that this conference was not just a discussion but a place to lay the foundation for real cooperation and solidarity.
She then discussed changes in the international order and issues of sovereignty, pointing out that the post-Cold War illusion that internationalist norms could replace sovereignty has incurred great costs. Over the past 80 years, major countries have effectively delegated their sovereignty to global institutions, while competitor nations strengthened their military and economic power. The conference prominently discussed energy policy and national interest, freedom of the press and expression, and migration issues. Participants noted that governments, digital platforms, and intelligence agencies across democracies were suppressing citizens’ voices. They also emphasized that energy is not a climate variable, but a variable directly linked to national security, living standards, and sovereignty, and that policies limiting domestic production weaken national competitiveness. To respond, it was proposed to rebuild supply chains and bring industries back home using strategic energy resources such as oil, gas, nuclear, and next-generation technologies.
Regarding migration, Luna made it clear: “This discussion is not about hostility toward immigrants. It is about the basic duty of every sovereign country to decide who enters its territory.” She stressed that open borders increasingly go against democratic demands, and that electing leaders and implementing policies reflecting voters’ choices are the essence of democracy.
For future action, Luna presented eight principles:
Governments must implement policies based on citizens’ clear political will and democratic support.
Real change should be created by leveraging networks within international sovereignty alliances.
Leadership is needed to correct distorted discussions on sovereignty, borders, and identity by elite institutions and the media, and to actively convey a positive vision.
International cooperation should be maintained, but reformed to protect national interests.
Freedom of expression and the press must be actively protected, and cases of political persecution must be highlighted internationally.
Energy independence, supply chain recovery, and next-generation technology development should be promoted as strategic common goals.
Borders must be effectively controlled, distinguishing legal and illegal migration, with legal and political systems strengthened accordingly.
Luna compared the conference to the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1774, emphasizing that it was not merely an international summit but a potential foundation for a long-term alliance. She said, “History will judge not by what was said in this room, but by what we build from it,” stressing the need for specific actions and policy implementation after the conference. She concluded that freedom and sovereignty are not maintained by dialogue alone, but require action and struggle.
The summit is evaluated as an important forum that comprehensively examined sovereignty, freedom, energy security, and governance strategies while emphasizing practical solidarity. Participants confirmed their commitment to creating tangible change in their countries based on this network, promising continuous alliance activities, including future gatherings in Europe.
The official Alliance of Sovereign Nations (ASN) summit was recognized not merely as a venue for knowledge sharing or discussion, but as a practical platform for solidarity that protects national sovereignty and freedom, rebuilds civil society, and drives tangible change within the international community. Participants exchanged ideas with leaders from diverse fields and countries, expanded networks, and reaffirmed common objectives including national security, energy independence, and the safeguarding of freedom and sovereignty, fostering a strong sense of achievement. The event also provided concrete ideas that can translate into actionable policies and initiatives by highlighting the real-world challenges and strategic solutions facing governments and civil societies.
Throughout the summit, attendees experienced firsthand the importance of long-term cooperation and collaboration. Through new connections and in-depth discussions, participants witnessed the establishment of a practical foundation for achieving shared goals as an international coalition. In particular, the summit clarified that core issues, freedom and sovereignty, national security, and energy independence are not mere slogans but can be implemented through realistic policies and concrete actions. The networks and dialogues formed during the summit are expected to serve as essential references and practical foundations for future policy execution and collaborative projects in participating countries.
The overall atmosphere and outcomes of the official event demonstrated that the objectives of protecting sovereignty and freedom, rebuilding civil society, and addressing strategic challenges do not end with discussion alone but can be linked directly to action and solidarity. Participants gained a tangible understanding of the value of international alliances and the importance of practical cooperation, acquiring both confidence and responsibility to drive meaningful change in their respective countries and fields. The official ASN summit, therefore, stands as a significant milestone that reinforced freedom and sovereignty, strengthened civil society, and laid a concrete foundation for long-term action and policy implementation in the international arena.
Comments